Age criteria for polysomnography and inpatient management for adenotonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) by the American Academy of Otolaryngology recommend that children <2yo with sleep disordered breathing (SDB) undergo preoperative polysomnography (PSG) and children <3yo be admitted following adenotonsillectomy (TA) for inpatient management. As the rationale for preoperative PSG and postoperative admission in the CPG are the same, there is an inconsistency in the age recommendations between <2yo and two to three-years-old (2-3yo). This study compared the characteristics of <2yo versus 2-3yo patients undergoing workup and treatment for SDB, with the goal of determining whether 2-3yo should be classified with <2yo. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with retrospective review. SETTING: Boston Medical Center, a tertiary academic hospital. METHODS: Patients ≤3yo who underwent PSG 2015 to 2019 were identified using a filter through the electronic medical record. 448 patients underwent PSG. Bivariate analysis via Pearson chi-square test and multivariate analysis via multinomial logistic regression were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: Of the 427 patients included in this study, 217 patients were in the age group of <2yo while 210 patients were in the age group of 2-3yo. Severity of OSA (p = 0.069) and surgical outcomes (defined by presence or resolution of OSA on follow-up PSG) (p = 0.260) were similar between the two groups. Children <2yo were more likely to have smaller tonsils (p < 0.024) than 2-3yo. CONCLUSION: Characteristics, such as severity of OSA, were similar between the age groups. Further studies should be conducted to determine if consideration should be taken for routine preoperative PSG children <3yo. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Incidence of audiologic or otolaryngologic evaluation in patients with external ear anomalies.

PURPOSE: The relationship between specific external ear anomalies (EEA) and hearing loss has been previously described. However, there is no literature regarding the appropriate evaluation of patients with EEA by audiology or otolaryngology. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of audiologic or otolaryngologic evaluation of patients with EEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of charts was conducted following approval from the institutional review board at Boston Medical Center. Charts of patients younger than 18 years old with EEA, identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 codes 380-380.99, 744, and 744.4 and ICD-10 codes H61.90-92, Q16.0-16.9, Q17.0-17.9, Q18.0-18.2, from January 2012 to January 2019 were reviewed. Primary variables included incidence of audiologic and otolaryngologic evaluation, newborn hearing screen and audiometry results, and completion of surgical intervention. Binary logistic regressions were conducted for each group for diagnostic, procedural, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 723 patients were diagnosed with EEA from January 2012 to January 2019. Of these patients, 327 (45.2 %) were evaluated by audiology and 327 (45.2 %) were evaluated by otolaryngology. Of the 364 patients who obtained audiograms, 63 (17.3 %) demonstrated hearing loss. Surgical procedures were performed on 119 (16.5 %) patients, with the most common procedure being excision of the EEA (n = 79, 66.4 %). A total of 468 patients had a documented newborn hearing screen. Failure of newborn hearing screen and presence of microtia were associated with increased otolaryngologic and audiologic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients with EEAs do not obtain audiologic or otolaryngologic evaluation.

Severe Versus Very Severe Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Outcomes After Adenotonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is generally considered the first line treatment for pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Pediatric patients with severe OSA have worse outcomes after AT than patients with milder OSA. It is currently unclear if this group of higher morbidity patients should be subdivided further. This study investigates patients with severe pediatric OSA to determine if there are differences in postsurgical outcomes based on initial severity of sleep disordered breathing, medical comorbidities, or demographic factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients aged 2-18 who underwent polysomnogram (PSG) from October 2012 to January 2019, had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >10, and subsequently underwent AT were identified using a filter through electronic medical record. A total of 112 patients underwent both pre- and postoperative PSG. Bivariate analysis was conducted via Pearson chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analyses via binary logistic and multinomial linear regressions were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients included in this study, 68 patients were identified as having severe OSA (AHI = 10-20) and 44 as having very severe OSA (AHI > 20). Very severe OSA patients were significantly less likely to be cured of sleep disordered breathing or have their OSA reduced to mild OSA. Obese patients were found to have less reduction in AHI after AT. CONCLUSIONS: The postsurgical outcomes of patients with severe and very severe OSA are significantly different indicating that patients traditionally categorized as having severe OSA may need to be further subcategorized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1855-1860, 2022.

Medical Student Leadership in the Student Oncology Society: Evaluation of a Student-Run Interest Group.

At our institution, we aim to foster interest in oncology through the Student Oncology Society (SOS). The SOS was formed in 2010 and since then has hosted numerous oncology-related events, such as career panels, patient survivorship celebrations, and movie screenings. The purpose of this study is to report the experiences from former student leaders of the SOS, particularly how their participation informed their career choice. Complete survey responses were obtained from 26 of 32 former SOS student leaders (response rate 81.3%). Out of the 26 respondents, 19 (73.1%) are pursuing an oncology-related specialty. The three most common competencies that were affected by participation in SOS, noted by 21 (80.8%) respondents, were learning about pathways to careers in oncology, understanding the multidisciplinary approach to cancer care, and coordinating events. By mean Likert score, the most important factors in career choice for respondents who eventually pursued an oncology field were having a mentor in oncology (4.44), a clinical rotation in oncology (4.31), research involvement (4.22), and SOS involvement (3.17). While SOS involvement played a role in career choice among our student leaders, having a mentor was cited to be the most important factor for choosing an oncology career. Thus, implementation of formal mentorship initiatives within the framework of oncology interest groups should be explored.